Objective:\udThe use of cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAPP) as a new therapeutic option to aid the healing of chronic wounds appears promising. Currently, uncertainty exists regarding their classification as medical device or medical drug. Because the classification of CAPP has medical, legal, and economic consequences as well as implications for the level of preclinical and clinical testing, the correct classification is not an academic exercise, but an ethical need.\ud\udMethod:\udA multidisciplinary team of physicians, surgeons, pharmacists, physicists and lawyers has analysed the physical and technical characteristics as well as legal conditions of the biological action of CAPP.\ud\udResults:\udIt was concluded that the mode of action of the locally generated CAPP, with its main active components being different radicals, is pharmacological and not physical in nature.\ud\udConclusion:\udDepending on the intended use, CAPP should be classified as a drug, which is generated by use of a medical device directly at the point of therapeutic application.
展开▼
机译:目的:使用冷大气压血浆(CAPP)作为一种新的治疗选择,以帮助慢性伤口的愈合似乎很有希望。当前,关于它们分类为医疗器械还是医疗药物存在不确定性。由于CAPP的分类具有医学,法律和经济后果,并且对临床前和临床测试的水平有影响,因此正确的分类不是学术活动,而是一种道德需求。\ ud \ udMethod:\ ud医师,外科医生,药剂师,物理学家和律师对CAPP的生物作用的物理和技术特征以及法律条件进行了分析。\ ud \ ud结果:\ ud结论是,本地产生的CAPP的作用方式及其主要活性成分是不同的基团,本质上是药理学上的,而不是物理上的。\ ud \ ud结论:\ ud根据预期用途,应将CAPP归类为药物,它是在治疗时直接通过使用医疗设备产生的应用。
展开▼